One of the largest known Neolithic sites in the Near East, located in the Konya plain of southern Anatolia, about 11 km from modern Çumra. A section of the 32-acre site was excavated by James Mellaart in the 1960s (1967; 1975), revealing 14 building phases radiocarbondated to the period 6250–5400 BC, roughly contemporary with the Levantine Pre-pottery Neolithic B or AMUQ A-B periods. The subsistence at Çatal Hüyük was based on cattle domestication and irrigation agriculture, with crops including emmer, einkorn and barley, as well as field peas, acorns, pistachios and almonds. Mellaart’s study of the carbonized organic remains from the site as well as the evidence for early metallurgy were both exceptional achievements for an excavation in the 1960s.
The site is perhaps best known for the paintings, ox skulls and relief sculptures decorating the internal walls of many of the houses, including protuberances interpreted as female breasts (sometimes incorporating boar-tusks and vulture-beaks) and figures of women apparently giving birth to wild beasts, as well as paintings of humans dressed as vultures apparently engaged in funeral rites. As at many other Near Eastern Neolithic sites, the corpses were buried beneath the floors of houses. At Çatal Hüyük, however, the burial customs also involved the deliberate excarnation of the bodies and the removal of the skulls, which were placed in baskets on the floors of some of the houses.
Ian Hodder has re-examined the GENDER distinctions and symbolic relationships of the house decoration, deducing that ‘early material symbolism is involved in the celebration and control of the wild, and that the control relates to social power through the representation of male and female and through the organization of space’ (Hodder 1990: 10–11). This study of the Çatal Hüyük house decoration forms part of the basic thesis of The domestication of Europe, in which he interprets the emergence of the European Neolithic as ‘a socialsymbolic process’ in which ‘animals, plants, clay, death, and perhaps reproduction are all “natural” phenomena which are “cultured” and brought within the control of a social and cultural system’ (Hodder 1990: 18–19). Beginning in the 1990s, Hodder undertook new excavations at the site, partly in order to address the question of whether, as Mellaart had suggested, craftwork was undertaken in a specialized area of the site rather than within the individual houses.
J. Mellaart: Çatal Hüyük: a Neolithic town in Anatolia (London, 1967); ––––: The Neolithic of the Near East (London, 1975), 98–111; I. Todd: Çatal Hüyük (Menlo Park, 1976); I. Hodder: ‘Contextual archaeology: an interpretation of Çatal Hüyük and a discussion of the origins of agriculture’, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology (University College London) 24 (1987), 43–56; ––––: The domestication of Europe (Oxford, 1990), 3–21; ——, ed.: On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95 (Cambridge, 1997). ISCopied